The optimal burnishing parameters studies were carried out as per<br>the standard orthogonal array L9 (34<br>). The experimental results were<br>analyzed through MINITAB 17 software tool that serves also with the<br>related DoE table. The surface roughness, burnishing force and tribological features were studied by Origin Pro data analysis and graphical<br>software.<br>The experiments guide were specified according to Table 2 and then<br>the surface roughness and burnishing force were evaluated by Taguchi<br>method (Table 3).<br>For evaluation (surface roughness and burnishing force) a surface<br>roughness measuring equipment (MITUTOYO Formtracer SV-C3000)<br>was used for pre-machined as well as for burnished surfaces. Each<br>surface was measured three times and the average of them are presented in the Table 4. The comparison of the pre-machined and burnished surfaces are shows in Fig. 12.<br>The Fig. 12 represents that after ball burnishing the peaks are<br>pressed down while the valleys are filled up according to the material<br>flow, but some of the valley were not filled up because they are too<br>deep. These remaining valleys not harmful because these are function<br>as oil pockets which results better sliding properties.<br>Table 5 shows the influence of the burnishing factor. This response<br>table helps to get more information about the process under investigation since the highest delta value appoints the most influential<br>factor. According to the results represented in this table, for surface<br>roughness reduction the order of influence of the factors is: 1. the<br>burnishing feed, 2. burnishing speed, 3. pre-machined surface quality<br>and 4. tool-workpiece gap.<br>The main effects of the burnishing factors on the surface roughness<br>improvement after MABB processing are shown in Fig. 13. In the Taguchi method, higher SNR for the experimental results is desirable and the optimal conditions can be easily determined by selecting the combination of the maximal SNR in each factor.<br>As shown in Fig. 13 the determined optimal condition is a combination of A1-B3-C2-D1 (vr: 20 m/min - vf: 75 mm/min - h: 11.5 mm - Ra:<br>0950 µm) (Table 2). This optimal combination was not tested in the<br>previous experiments because the combination was not matched in<br>Table 3.<br>The next response table (Table 6) shows the most influenting factor<br>for burnishing force improvement.<br>In this case the most influenting factor for surface reduction in sequence: 1. tool-workpiece gap, 2. burnishing speed, 3. pre-machined<br>surface quality and 4. burnishing feed.<br>The main effect of the burnishing factors on the burnishing force is<br>shown in Fig. 14, the determined optimal conditions are a combination of A2-B2-C2-D3 (vr: 40 m/min - vf: 50 mm/min - h: 11,5 mm - Ra:<br>1105 µm), that was not defined in Table 3.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
